Sunday, February 12, 2012

Brady Udall's The Lonely Polygamist


After hearing all the buzz surrounding this book, I was very eager to read it, and I must say, it exceeded my expectations. I was unsure of what to expect exactly. I wondered if would be a veiled diatribe on the evils of polygamy, or, perhaps, on the other end of the spectrum, a book about acceptance of non-traditional lifestyles. Neither of these suspicions proved correct. Instead, the book was about universal themes of loneliness, responsibility, and family. Perhaps most impressively, Udall drew together an impressive number of themes, characters, and narratives, which achieve a complexity that maintains a reader’s interest without creating a confusing story. As an added bonus, Udall has a true skill with prose that makes this novel a delight to read.

The Lonely Polygamist follows the life of Golden Richards: husband to four wives, father to twenty-eight children, and a man lacking backbone by all accounts. As Brady Udall tells the story of Golden, he weaves in the trials and tribulations Golden experiences as he deals with temptation, tells an ever-growing lie to his wives and community, and struggles with feelings of loneliness despite the fact he never seems to be alone. (The polygamist plot certainly offers a way to magnify the themes in the novel, especially loneliness.) To give more perspective to the story, Udall follows two other characters to expose how multiple Richards are experiencing the same disappointments in life. Insights into the lives of Golden’s fourth wife and one of his sons who is undoubtedly the black sheep of the family uncover a recurrent issue in all three major narratives: neglect—a neglect that permeates the lives of the Richards family. Not only do the parents neglect the children—there are simply so many—but the spouses neglect each other, the children neglect their siblings, and, worst of all, they all neglect themselves and neglect attending to things will that achieve fulfillment and contentment.

Ultimately, the results of the neglect manifest as feelings of being encumbered. The Richards clan is burdened by the oppressive feelings of neglect, burdened by their pasts, and burdened by each other. In the end, though, the situations the characters saw as burdens outside their control, they now see as responsibilities chosen out of love. While the characters do not necessarily find the happiness they expected, and without giving too much away, they do find ways to accept the choices they have made and do so with a greater appreciation of the boundlessness of love. And so, I will end with a quote from the book that, to me, captures the beauty of one of the message of the book:

          Because this, after all, was the basic truth they all chose to live by: that love was no infinite       
          commodity. That it was not subject to the cruel reckoning of addition and subtraction, that to give   
          to one did not necessarily mean to take from another; that the heart, in its infinite capacity .  . . 
          could open itself to all who would enter, like a house with windows and doors thrown wide, like 
          the heart of God itself, vast and accommodating and holy, a mansion of rooms without number, 
          full of multitudes without end. (545)

Udall, Brady. The Lonely Polygamist. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010.

1 comment:

  1. I found The Lonely Polygamist to be well-written and enjoyable, even amusing at times, while exploring themes of loneliness and the isolation of being part of a non-mainstream subculture. Udall doesn't judge his characters so much as present them, and it's hard not to find some sympathy for Golden, Trish and Rusty. However, I was deeply dissatisfied by the ending, where the character changes were sometimes subtle and not necessarily in the best interests of the Richards clan. If anything, a book that should have been a repudiation of polygamy became an affirmation of it. And where you fall on that issue will largely inform how you ultimately feel about it. I respect it as a novel, but disagree with its ultimate conclusions.

    ReplyDelete